September 3 2010, 08:57

From: arbitrary constant (rich)

Right to Control Trailblazer: Money, outcomes and money again

This post is one of a series of reflections on the Right to Control Trailblazer work in Essex over the last few months. For an overview of the work, and an introduction to this post, please see the opening post of this series.

In the present climate, one of the drivers for this work has got to be understanding how joining up the work makes it more effective, both in terms of service user outcomes and in terms of the resources used.

To concentrate on the latter, one area we're currently working on is the cash quantification of a particular service. Once this has been done it is then possible for a service user to have much more control over the services they choose to use, or more to the point the way in which they choose going about meeting their identified outcomes. For example, if Access to Work would fund a taxi for a service user to and from work, it could be possible to give that individual the cash equivalent of those taxi journeys if they can still show they will successfully get to and from work. This ultimately means more choice and control for the service user in meeting the same outcome.

In the first instance, the process challenge this presents is associating service user outcomes with particular pots of money. Once that has successfully been done, the issue then becomes one of attributing service user outcomes to particular pots of money.

Assuming this has been done, and the two processes of assessment and support planning mean that it should be relatively straightforward, the absolutely vital question is this: if a service user has achieved outcomes for less than the pot of money allocated to them, who gets the savings? The main options are (a) the service user, (b) each individual agency, or (c) the collective agencies. For various reasons, I suspect (a) is not a feasible option (though it should be). But cases (b) and (c) are both difficult in principle and doubly-difficult in practice to achieve.

The corollary to this are those occasions in which savings made in one area affect the overall level of resource an individual receives. This could then have a negative knock-on as to what other resources they could receive, since some rely on thresholds being passed before funding is available (e.g. Independent Living Fund is only available to individuals who already receive a certain amount of adult social care funding). I very strongly suspect this won't be allowed to happen, but it's certainly a potential unintended consequence that has to be looked at and worked on very carefully to ensure it isn't allowed to happen.

September 3 2010, 06:04

From: arbitrary constant (rich)

September 3 2010, 05:50

From: Owen abroad » Blog (Owen Barder)

How to use and understand statistics: good briefs

Regular readers will have noticed that things have been quiet around here for a while. I’ll be back to blogging properly in a while.

In the meantime, I am dead impressed by this collection of very accessible briefs from the House of Commons Library (of all places). The briefs are easy to understand, and they will be useful for people who are trying to write good analysis as well as for people who want to understand the statistics that they are reading.

Here are links to the briefs (all of which are pdf files):

«
»

END ADDED –>Hat tip: Flowing Data and Lone Gunman

September 3 2010, 05:14

From: DavePress (Dave)

Personal learning and technology



I blogged over on the Learning Pool site about the personalisation of learning and development in public sector (indeed, any) organisations, and the role of technology in it.

Thought DavePress readers might also be interested.

One of the interesting developments of web technology has been the increasing focus on individual, personal choices. Don’t like what’s on TV? Choose something for yourself to watch on YouTube. Nothing of interest in the newspaper? Use Google to find a blog that covers the issues you’re into. And so on.

Now this issue of personal choice isn’t limited to our personal tastes in media consumption. It applies to everything. Increasingly, it’s applying to learning and development – and that could have significant implications for workforce learning.

Read the rest of it here.

Possibly related posts:

September 3 2010, 04:00

From: FutureGov (Dominic Campbell)

Come and get ‘em! CityCamp London tickets out now!

Get your CityCamp London tickets here now!

i got a ni-golden ticket, i got a ni-golden ticket

Image: Brandon Shigeta

That’s right, the time has come for us to end your waiting. With just 5 weeks to go until CityCamp London we have released those tickets (well, the first bunch of them at least)!

We have a stella line up waiting for you on the Friday at the Stimulate session (with more to be announced shortly) followed by a DIY weekend where we throw it open to you to set the agenda and talk about what it is you think London, its government, organisations and Londoners ourselves should all be talking about to make the most of technology and make London an even more world class city to live in.

So grab your ticket now, put down your ideas for the kind of session you would like to lead or be a part of on the Saturday, and get connecting to other CityCampers sharing your ideas for projects you might like to see developed by the end of the weekend.

Any questions, queries or offers of support, please drop us a line anytime at admin [at] wearefuturegov [dot] com or via Twitter at either @futuregov or @dominiccampbell.

Happy camping!

September 2 2010, 07:10

From: Lords of the Blog (Baroness Deech)

Season of Immobility

I have just come back from France on Eurostar and was mightily relieved that there were no breakdowns.  I only relax once the train has gone through the tunnel.  I had read that there were to be disruptions due to a dispute about who waves the train off from Paris, but it all went smoothly.  Now however we face a tube strike on 7 September, and I do not know how I am going to get across London, given the chaos that these strikes cause.  It is also likely that there is to be BA strike at Xmas time, when I am due to travel with them; and a strike is looming at the BBC.  I can well understand this one, as it is hard for staff to find that their pensions are being frozen while “talent” and some executives are paid very large salaries.  I have no sympathy for or understanding of the transport strikes.  First, they harm commuters, who already pay a fortune for their tickets and often travel in extreme discomfort.  Second, they damage the very existence of the enterprise, so that the strikers may eventually find they are out of a job.  Third, there are budget cuts all round. What can they achieve? Should the law be tightened still further?

September 2 2010, 01:55

From: andrewlewin: let me think about that ... (andrewlewin)

Do the new iPods deliver?

So Apple have unveiled the most extensive revamp of their iPod range this week. And yet, despite being an Apple fanboi going way back (before iPads, iPhones, iPods or even iMacs) I find myself in an odd fugue state of indifference, topped off with the first early warning signs of anxiety about Apple’s direction and future.

Last year the company unveiled the fifth generation iPod nano, and I was so excited that I had bought one within a couple of days. Far from being a rash decision, I can happily say that I’ve used the nano virtually every day of the year since and certainly never regretted the purchase.

The new nano is the most far-reaching redesign in the 2010 iPod line-up revamp, changing it to a square touchscreen device that continues Apple’s strategy of progressively cascading the ‘touch’ paradigm through its line-up. The touchscreen is clearly the thing to have these days and anything else with physical buttons and sliders is starting to look a bit tired and old hat: users used to iPhones start prodding the screen and wondering why it’s not working, until they reload the old and dated way of doing things back into their brain. And there’s no doubt that the simple clickable scroll-wheel – so effective when first introduced – is now creaking under the weight of finding ways to access all the gazillion new features that have crept onto the iPod since its launch.

So the addition of touch technology brings a little of that Apple glamour and pizzazz back to the nano, and helps stop it being potentially overlooked in a crowded market. But the sixth generation nano’s touchscreen implementation seems a rather halfway house solution, because the screen – while looking at first glance like the iPod touch/iPhone iOS – is purely cosmetic. It doesn’t run iOS and can’t have apps added to it, so it’s a bit of sleight-of-hand that doesn’t really hide the fact that its beauty is barely skin deep, and I suspect this limitation will disappoint as many people as the redesign will delight. In addition, the screen is now rather too small to easily navigate through lots of music, and the touchscreen makes it hard to use when out for a run or any other time you can’t stop, take out the nano to look at and fiddle with.

But the main reason I’m disappointed in the new nano is that it removes video capability. I’m not referring to the video camera/recording per se – I’ve not used that very often on my nano, but on the other hand it does nicely fit a gap in functionality on my old iPhone 3G phone – but I do find the removal of a much-touted fifth generation feature to be a somewhat retrograde step. No, my main complaint on video is that the new iPod nano can’t play video. At all. No more vodcasts, no more watching TV programmes recorded through my Elgato tuner (which I’ve gone a fair amount of over the year.) That’s a real drawback, actually a dealbreaker for me. Why remove that feature? Not being able to pack in the video camera hardware into the diminished casing I can understand, but how can the nano software suddenly lose the ability to play video after all this time?

At least the new nano retains its FM radio, which I was particularly excited about with the fifth generation last year. I actually feared that it, too, would be swept away by the change in physical form, so it’s nice to see it retained. It actually makes me surprised that the revamped iPod touch is singularly lacking an FM radio chip in its latest incarnation. Otherwise, the new iPod touch delivers everything that was expected – in particular the front-facing camera and the Facetime video conferencing capability. This was an absolute top priority for Apple, because establishing Facetime as a video conferencing standard needs it to be on more devices than simply the top-of-the-line iPhone 4, and so this iPod touch brings it “to the masses” – or at least as mass as it’s ever likely to get.

The one thing that surprises me with the iPod touch upgrade is that its appearance looks … Well, pretty much the same as the previous model. Apparently it’s a little thinner, but not by so much as you’d notice. That means the general overall aesthetic is still the same as the iPhone 3G and 3GS, and fairly close to the iPad. What it’s not like, however, is the iPhone 4, and that leaves the iPhone 4 looking like the odd one out: “one of these things is not like the other ones.” As a result, its sleek, metal, sharp-edged design looks rather un-Applelike against the carefully curved other models in the mobile range. Now it could be that Apple just wants the iPhone 4 to remain unique and special, or it could be that the iPhone 4 style simply doesn’t work well with an ultraslim physical form. But by leaving the iPhone 4 looking so different, it does raise the suggestion that someone, somewhere has already decided that it’s not the future of Apple’s mobile devices and that the iPhone 4 design has already been consigned to the “lame duck” category of history.

Because it’s true, Apple do make mistakes when it comes to product design: and you only have to look at the overhaul of the iPod shuffle to see this. The new model is fairly square, with buttons on its front face, while the previous model was longer and thinner with all the controls on the headphone lead. But look a generation back from that, and you’ll find that the 2008 shuffle is squarer, with buttons on its front face … Exactly like the 2010 model. Okay, the new model is thinner, and brings in the VoiceOver technology lacking from the 2008 model, but in all other respects this is one of the clearest examples yet we’ve had of Apple holdings its hands up and admitting “yeah, sorry about that 2009 model, it was a complete dog.”

Having the courage to own up and backtrack is actually quite laudable, but what’s missing here is that Apple seem to be completely out of ideas for what to do with the product than put it back to how it was before they broke it. A first sign of Apple’s design maestros running on empty? Or simply an illustration of how difficult even Apple finds it to deliver striking products to their usual dazzling standard at the low-cost end of the market?

You sense that Apple would love to just do away with the shuffle – that the new iPod nano touchscreen is really where they see this part of the market, being quite small enough (in fact – rather too small, especially for a touchscreen device). But the shuffle is a key part of Apple’s business strategy, its low price protecting the iPod range from the attacking hoards of budget MP3 players that are out there. In the same way, Apple clearly hate having to continue the iPod classic line and would love to get rid of it and have the iPod touch as the unchallenged king of the iPods, but they can’t – 128Gb RAM chips are proving elusive, and so the hard disc technology of the iPod classic is necessary for those music obsessives that need over 100Gb of storage on their device. But for the meantime the classic is a necessary evil, and so it sits in Apple’s product line-up, looking old and tired and neglected – just merely indispensable at the same time.

There were a few other launches at Apple’s September 1 event other than the refreshed iPod line-up: the next iPhone operating system, iOS 4.1, was announced – and top of the list was a fix for using it on the old iPhone 3G hardware. This (even more than antenna-gate, which was massively overhyped by blogs and media) has been a real black mark against Apple of late: when iOS 4.0 came out, the 3G was still part of the current iPhone range being sold by Apple. Even if that was only for a week overlap, there were still people buying a new phone on up to a 18 month contract who instantly could not use the current recommended OS for it without serious performance issues. It’s one thing to remove support and deprecate an out-of-date product, but to make a model obsolete while it’s still in your retail line-up is reprehensible.

There’s also the Apple TV, but outside the US this is rather hobbled by international licensing deals and consequently still feels like a dispensable sideline for Apple. What’s raised most eyebrows about Apple TV in the UK has been the price – the £99 matching the $99, the first time we’ve seen pound/dollar parity. The Apple TV seems a bit of a blip on Apple’s pricing, but other Apple prices are also skyrocketing (the new nano is about 25% more than the old one, for example) and even Apple seem to be getting a little uncomfortable about how this is coming across, carefully adding information to their UK Store pages detailing how much of that is down to sales taxes (VAT) and import duties. While it’s true that the pound has fared poorly on the money markets in the last year, and VAT will be going up to 20% in January, it’s still astonishing just how much Apple are hiking their prices, while all the other IT retailers are slashing prices to nothing (for example, under £300 for a laptop) – but then, Apple sales are exploding despite the price, so maybe it just shows that Apple know more about this than I do. Or indeed most economists do! Apple seem happy shooting for the premium crowd, where “if you need to ask the price, you can’t afford it” – but will this last or prove to be a bubble?

And there was also the launch of iTunes 10, the latest version of Apple’s media player/manager. Here’s a program that urgently needs a complete reboot – it’s got large, bloated, confusing and disorganised over the years as more and more demands and features have been foisted upon it. For a simple media player, the amount of system resources it hogs these days is astonishing. But instead of tackling all of this, Apple have simply landed it with another whole chunk of stuff to take care of – this time social networking via music, a network they call Ping. I can honestly say that another social network was not something I was thinking as being missing from my life, and while it’s been hailed as “the final nail in MySpace’s coffin” I can’t help but think this is far too little and far too late in the day to be getting into this game. Then again, I’d have said the same about Apple’s clearly doomed attempt to infiltrate the mature mobile phone market just before they launched the iPhone, so if anyone can pull off the impossible then it’s Apple.

However, there are a few things about iTunes 10 and Ping (other than feature-bloat) that make me scratch my head and worry that Apple are starting to falter at keeping all these plates spinning. Early users of Ping have been trying to set up user accounts … And finding that their avatar pictures don’t appear, until they have been “approved”. It’s Apple’s control tendencies showing again, mixed with the same puritanical streak that sees them censor anything remotely smutty or sleazy from the App Store. But having to get an avatar approved by the all-seeing Apple? Even for committed Apple fanbois this is surely a level of central control beyond a joke. And for everyone else, is this a network that you’d be happy joining? Apple clearly don’t have a grasp on social media or understand that it cannot be directed and controlled without killing it off. On just this one piece of early evidence, I have grave doubts Ping will ever make any impact and that it may quickly whither and die, much as its original foray into online communities, eWorld, similarly suffocated and died.

The other point about iTunes 10 is a very, very minor one: they’ve moved the three buttons for closing, minimising or expanding so that they now run vertically like traffic lights – instead of horizontally, as they appear on every other piece of software on the Mac OS. It’s a OS interface constant, a standard, so that everyone knows where the buttons are, what they do, how they work. And Apple have mucked around with this for no good apparent reason, but just because they felt like it. Interface designers know that you don’t monkey around with such things on a whim, so what are Apple playing at?

It is, as I have already admitted, a very minor detail. And yet there is something about it that seems telling to me, where such attention to small detail that used to be the defining characteristic of the company. And it’s in this and in the other parts of the iPod line-up covered in this article, either through highly uncharacteristic carelessness perhaps simply from being overstretched. The volume of output from Apple over the past few years has been astonishing, and we’re talking about a company a fraction of the size of Microsoft – which had been all but inert for years now, God alone knows what all those people are doing up in Seattle. Apple’s “start-up” size has worked for them over the years but now it might be catching up with them, the cracks showing as they take on more than they can carry, and as a result some of the plates can no longer be kept spinning: just look back at the iPhone 4 antenna-gate problem, the early iPad wi-fi problems, the issues with iOS4, the fact that iWorks hasn’t had a major upgrade in two years, and then add the sense that the latest iterations of products frankly aren’t as interesting or innovative as we’re used to from Apple. Too much to do, too little time to allow for innovation and inspiration.

And also … I do wonder whether any of this might stem from Steve Job’s medical leave last year. There’s things here that I wouldn’t have expected Jobs to let go through if he’d been in charge at the time, little slips that would have had him been in a rage and demanding to fix. Maybe the experience has changed him, and that infuriating, dynamic, demanding, contrary, driving, unique, charismatic dynamo at the heart of Apple is no longer the force it was. And if Apple’s core starts to falter, then will Apple itself decline and fall in turn?

Or perhaps this is just a simple blip, and all will be well with the Applesphere next time around. Let’s hope.


Filed under: Technology Tagged: apple, apple tv, iphone, ipod, ipod nano, iTunes, steve jobs

September 2 2010, 01:06

From: Tom Watson MP (Tom)

Letter to Nick Clegg

David Cameron is taking paternity leave so I’ve sent the attached letter to Deputy PM, Nick Clegg. This episode needs clearing up, once and for all.

September 2 2010, 12:00

From: Communities and Collaboration (Steve Dale)

Bookmarks for August 30th through September 2nd

Google Buzz



These are my links for August 30th through September 2nd:

  • Facebook and Twitter meet iTunes in Ping – Apple takes further strides to integrate iTunes with social networks. I'm wondering where this leaves services such as Last.fm and Blip.fm?
  • 10 Tips For Aspiring Community Managers – As the world of dominant brands becomes more fragmented, established companies and startups are hiring community managers to cultivate an engaged community in a digital world where customers’ experiences with the product is amplified through social media, whether good or bad. And it’s not just the experience that users value; the relationships and connections they are able to make with companies and fellow consumers are just as important.
  • Drupal Gardens | Get a Free Drupal 7 Site Here – Build community websites simply and easily. Can be hosted by Drupal Gardens of exported to your chosen hosting service.
  • 500 Internal Server Error – 500 Internal Server Error
  • Google buys another social networking site in preparation for GoogleMe – Looks like the rumours about Google gearing up to launch a 'GoogleMe' social networking site to rival Facebook may be true. Why else aquire yet another social networking website and add to its stable of social media/social networking experts? Google has been dabbling around with social networking for some time. It owns the Orkut social network website, which has been active since 2004 and is extremely popular in Brazil and India but less so in the rest of the world. Google Friend Connect was an attempt to allow users to connect friends together on different websites, which again has failed to make much impact. Howevere, these are all lessons learned and I think that Google is determined to get it right with Google Me.

September 2 2010, 11:36

From: arbitrary constant (rich)

Right to Control Trailblazer: Policy 'versus' process

This post is one of a series of reflections on the Right to Control Trailblazer work in Essex over the last few months. For an overview of the work, and an introduction to this post, please see the opening post of this series.

I've been surprised throughout the Trailblazer process by how little policy is spoken of. My perception is that people delivering services 'on the ground' think of policy happening elsewhere; in some cases, people think that policy doesn't affect them.

This strikes me as worrying, for 4 reasons.

The first is what it means for people's motivations. I think it is vital that people delivering a public service understand the "why?" as much as the "how?". If they have a framework within which they can understand their role, the purpose of the work they do, and the expectations that are required of them, then they are more likely to positively contribute to the delivery of that service. Policy is a vital part of creating that framework, so to think that it's something that happens elsewhere is to undermine one of the foundations for the success of service delivery or reform.

Not engaging in policy discussions means potentially missing out on service transformation. Engaging with what a policy is seeking to achieve is engaging with changing at every level the way a service is approached, delivered, and ultimately what the service is there to achieve. To take one example: you can think of adult social care as meeting the day to day needs of disabled and older people. Or you can think of adult social care as the means by which people, irrespective of age or impairment, can live independent and fulfilling lives. Without an eye on the policy, the potential for transformation is compromised.

The third reason is that not engaging with policy means focusing too much on process. It is easier for people to talk about things they know and to make small improvements to the stuff they do already. By not discussing and debating the policy approach (the "why?") it becomes easy to concentrate on the comfort of the "how?".

The final reason for worrying about a lack of policy discussion is that it exacerbates the central 'versus' local tension. This seems to me to be most pertinent in the opposite way to that we'd normally expect: at the level of central government. If local public agencies don't engage in the policy discussion then there could be a tendency at the centre to disengage from the implementation of that policy. This is unhelpful in several ways, not least of which is a potential lack of feedback about whether or not the policy is right, or ways in which the centre can act to facilitate successful implementation.

September 2 2010, 11:17

From: News from a Nerd (carriebish)

Social enterprises – what could possibly go wrong?

Not that I’m averse to social enterprises, in fact let me state up front that I think it’s a large part of the solution to the current public service funding crisis (yes, crisis).  But I saw this article (via @SpencerLWilson*) and it’s fair to say it raises a few concerns about the idea of public services being spun-off into social enterprises.

The idea that turning a public service into a social enterprise is ‘effectively privatisation’ is something that hadn’t really occurred to me before, but I suppose it is in the sense that it’s opening public services up to market forces.  Then again there are no shareholders to skew the interests of the enterprise so it’s not what I would consider to be privatisation in its fullest sense (economists please correct me if you’re so inclined).

In my Happy Place I like to think of public service social enterprises as small entities owned and run by former local authority staff in blissful partnership with service users, commissioned by a local authority but also at liberty to generate income from other sources and provide services in a more efficient and innovative way. Aaaah, that sounds nice, right?

I think I’ve been forgetting a few things:

  • A lot of local authority staff don’t like change
  • There are a lot of control freak managers in the public sector
  • Many of the good managers lack the essential skills of running a business
  • Not all service users have wildly imaginative ways of redesigning services up their collective sleeve
  • Managers and service users aren’t used to working in partnership
  • Some social enterprises require an initial cash injection to establish themselves, particularly if they are providing a service that needs infrastructure
  • People are relying on those services and if the social enterprise has teething problems or ultimately fails then those people don’t get the care they need
  • Trade unions don’t understand the agenda enough to support it

That’s a whole bunch of risk and mitigating each risk will take time and consideration, something lacking in the public sector at the moment due to the impending doom of the spending review and the likely need to make massive cuts on the shortest of timescales.

A proliferation of social enterprises can definitely save money in the long term (this is not based on anything other than a hunch, by the way) and will surely lead to more innovation and the freedom to think creatively but I’m worried it’s being seen as a quick fix.  Instead I’d like to see councils incubating social enterprises, bringing in mentors and people who know business to help managers adapt, bringing in service users to run the show, developing them and council staff over a couple of years, nurturing the enterprise and then setting it free into the market with a solid foundation and some great people.  Uh oh, I’ve drifted back to my Happy Place.

Based on the article it seems like there’s a chasm between the public’s understanding of the benefits of spinning off their services into social enterprises (enterprae?) and the thinking being done by chief execs and local strategic partnership boards.  How to bridge this chasm is something I’m still working on…

*In the interests of full disclosure I’m doing some FutureGov work with Kirklees and let me just say if anyone can make this work it’s probably them.  And I’m not just saying that :)


September 2 2010, 10:59

From: Talk About Local (Nicky Getgood)

Content idea from Bournville Village: News from the notice boards

Bournville Village Notice Board

Bournville Village Notice Board

News from the notice boards is a great new regular feature that Dave Harte has introduced on the Bournville Village website:

One of the best ways to find out what’s happening in and around Bournville is to take time to read the notice boards on the Village Green. We’ll be making this a regular category on the website. Here’s some upcoming events and courses we’ve learned about…

Are there communal noticeboards in your area where people tend to put up posters about local events, courses and lost cats?  Think about posting updates from the information on them as a regular feature on your community website.

September 2 2010, 10:30

From: Helpful Technology: Blog (Steph)

Reloading commentable documents: introducing Read+Comment



At TeaCamp today, I’m taking the Campers through one of my new projects, Read+Comment, designed to offer hassle-free publishing of commentable documents online.

Introducing Read+Comment
View more presentations from Steph Gray.

It’s based on some work I’ve done recently for BIS, updating the Commentariat WordPress theme so that the team can roll out more flexible sites around their strategies and consultations, and do it without needing technical support hence saving money and time.

From an outsider’s perspective, it looks like digital engagement in the UK in this specific area are going in three directions:

  1. Collaborative drafting and detailed commenting on a document, using platforms like WriteToReply
  2. Crowdsourcing, reviewing and prioritising ideas, using platforms like Delib’s OpinionSuite
  3. Ongoing engagement around a strategy, where the document or questions are the stimulus for a wider discussion, using blog-based platforms and social media channels, like Commentariat

Personally, I’ve always been interested in refining and perfecting number 3 – it’s where there’s the greatest potential in the short and medium term to engage stakeholders beyond those with a strong professional interest, in meaningful discussion about what government should do.

So I see Read+Comment as the next phase – a platform that makes it possible to publish a document online, and build an engagement platform around it, in hours rather than days, for hundreds rather than thousands of pounds, while staying within government rules on websites.

The Directgov Review is a nice example of the platform in action, garnering over 100 considered views in a couple of weeks, from a wide range of informed stakeholders. The cloud-based platform coped fine with the spike in traffic when the site was launched, and the team moderating the comments went from a standing start on a Friday, to a live site on a Tuesday, with virtually no training or support.

Looking forward, there are two big milestones on the roadmap over the next few months: one, to build a bigger support infrastructure around the site as the volume of hosted documents grows; and second, to build in a monitoring and tracking dashboard into the WordPress backend, so it’s easy to see how your project is going and report on the results.

If you’d like to test out Read+Comment on one of your projects, please drop me a line or give me a call on 020 3012 1024.

Related posts:

  1. Five ways to publish commentable documents online
  2. Different strokes for different folks
  3. Introducing Commentariat & the POI Taskforce Report

September 2 2010, 08:01

From: FutureGov (delicious)

September 2 2010, 06:02

From: Policy and Performance (Ingrid Koehler)

Social media roundup

Lots of great conversations, content, events and more in August.

The big news:

LocalGov2.0 hits 100.  I’ve been collecting social media in local government case studies and publishing them to the LocalGov2.0 blog since January.  I recently added the 100th example and several of these have come from the community of practice.  And I’ve also added a submission form on the blog for new examples.  Keep them coming!

Featured events: CityCamp London – a brilliant 3 day event focusing on the web for city transformation, 8-10 October.   The focus is London, but the ideas are for everywhere.

Through the Knowledge Hub programme we’re planning more events, regional and an online conference.  Tell us what you’d like to see.

The Social Media CoP is on Twitter!

Conversations

Social media and children’s centres - have you seen a good example of social media use to support information, services and benefits take-up among young parents, with Facebook or another tool?  Somewhat related – in that it’s children – is a discussion around safeguarding2.0 – the use of social media to keep professionals in contact.  There’s a funded project around this just waiting for a council partner, so do check it out.

If Foursquare the next big thing? – this debate has run for a month and we still can’t decide.

Making Twitter work

Social media for emergency schemes - there’s been a lot of talk about Twitter – in particular, but social media (e.g. blogs for school closure) in general for emergencies and we certainly saw a lot of good use during the heavy snowfall this year, but does anyone an approach built in officially?

Records management for social media. It won’t be long before this becomes an issue somewhere – and there are some easy solutions for archiving etc – has anyone given any structure thought to this or taken action yet.

Using Yammer or other tools for internal comms

Social media for customer expectation management

Communicating the Knowledge Hub experience and benefits. The Knowledge Hub is the replacement for the communities of practice space, but will be a much more ‘social media’ enabled experience.  Find out how you can get involved.

New Resources

Thank you Preston Council for sharing your social media strategy. We’ve been collecting links in the wiki. Do you have a strategy or policy you can share? Social media training.

What are you doing to support social media training in your council? (A new wiki page has been set up to capture links to the training materials – like this one 23 things added recently.)

From the blogs:


September 2 2010, 02:29

From: Policy and Performance (Ingrid Koehler)

Cllr Andrew Wallis: councillor blog

Most of the examples in my LocalGov2.0 example blog have been about the institutional use of social media or open data in local government. But there are at least as many examples of councillors who are using social media to engage with local people, and I’ve decided that I’m going to start featuring a few here, perhaps aiming for one councillor blog a week.

I’ve been put off this a little bit, not because there aren’t some great examples, but because I lay myself open (slightly and perhaps only in my imagination) to the charge of political bias. Too many Conservative blogs? Too many Labour? Since I take a slightly random approach to featuring stuff, as in- ooh, that looks cool, I’ll grab it – I could easily end up with a run of, say LibDem, blogs without meaning to.

But this blog is primarily for me. It’s my well of examples for training and talks and to include in papers and so forth. I’m just sharing it because I hope it’s useful for others. And I need some councillor examples in the lead up to a series of events. So, councillor blogs it is. I have put in place a Google spreadsheet though to help me keep track of who I’ve featured, what party and what region they’re from so I can try to achieve some balance and so it’s transparent who I’ve featured. And I’ve also added a Google form for people to submit examples of councillor blogs they’d like to see featured. You don’t have to use the form….

Anyway, enough of that. Let’s look at the first blog.

Councillor Andrew Wallis, an Independent from Cornwall County Council and a parish councillor, has the dubious distinction of being first. He’s been going for not quite a year and posts regularly. He uses Google’s Blogger platform, which is completely free – I used it for years and think it’s pretty good. It’s easy to get a decent looking blog up in short time, and Cllr Wallis’s blog looks pretty darn good. Clean and professional, with lots of images.

If I were giving advice for councillor blogs (which I have done), I’d say he ticks almost all the boxes. There are easy to find contact details, links to other his other online profiles (Twitter) and a clear statement of his role at the council. And lots and lots of references to the place he serves. (The only thing he does which is contrary to my loose recommendations is that he has the title cllr in his blog’s web address, which could make things tricky if for some reason he leaves the council but wants to continue blogging. But too late to change easily).

The blog is a mix of reportage on local fun stuff – events which haven’t happened yet and those that have and reflections on council issues – some of them pretty technical, but explained in easy language for the resident who wants to know. He even recently discussed what it means to be Cornish, which I don’t much about, but do know to be thorny. And importantly, he links to other local bloggers. Blogging without linking is speaking into a void.


September 1 2010, 12:39

From: Lords of the Blog (Baroness Murphy)

The Demon Drink

Hogarth's Gin Lane

I like a drink, especially good wine. I recently gave up alcohol for ten days after returning from Italy, an annual penance that I feel does me good. I find alcohol a relaxant, makes me feel convivial and an instant endorphin producer. And I’d better own up to the fact that I once owned half of a brewery and was a significant shareholder in a gin distillery. (You could say I live on gin). So I’m sympathetic to the vast majority of people who also enjoy it and recognize what a valuable role it can play in society. But we have to face facts. Drinking to excess in Britain has risen in the past 50 years. As the price has gone down drinking to excess has gone up. When the culture of heavy drinking is acceptable, as it is among many sections of society, then price is the key determinant on whether someone will drink to excess. The price of beer and cider has fallen by about 30 per cent in real terms since 1990, while wine and spirits have fallen by about 20 per cent. As earnings have risen, alcohol is within everyone’s reach, less than a pound now for a bottle of Eurofizz lager or cheap cider bought at below cost from supermarkets selling as a loss leader.

As Sir Liam Donaldson, the former Chief Medical Officer said last year, cheap alcohol is “killing us as never before”. He said that the nation was blighted by “passive drinking”, with innocent bystanders the collateral damage of drunk drivers, domestic violence and antisocial behaviour. Hospital admissions involving people with an alcohol-related disease are up 69 per cent since 2003 and will soon reach a million annually. Liver disease shows a fivefold increase in the under-65s in the past 30 years and almost all of this increased morbidity is due to alcohol.

Donaldson wanted to introduce a minimum price of 50p a unit of alcohol, the immediate benefit would be 3,393 fewer deaths each year, 97,900 fewer hospital admissions and 45,800 fewer crimes. The Government rejected it, and I do not have much hope that the Coalition will face up to the powerful antipathetic lobbies of the drinks industry. The solution is staring us in the face as it did in the 18th century when the effect of gin on the working population was devastating.

In 1729 Parliament increased the tax on gin and this led to ill feeling in the working classes and ultimately to the gin riots . (Is this what the Government fears?) The government responded by reducing duties and penalties, claiming that moderate measures would be easier to enforce.  But Gin drinking continued to be a problem and by the 1740s the British were consuming 8,000,000 gallons a year. In 1751 the government took action and greatly increased duties on gin. The sale by distillers and shopkeepers was strictly controlled and these measures successfully reduced the consumption of gin in Britain.

Put the price of alcohol up to where it was twenty years ago and the problem would more or less be solved. Changing culture will take far too long, we are northern Europeans not southern European in our attitudes to drink. Someone will tell me that putting the price up would encourage smuggling (true) and that we can’t be so out of kilter with the rest of Europe. Why not? Even a small fiscal change would help us tackle the problem.

September 2 2010, 05:01

From: Local Democracy (Paul Evans)

Imbyism?

Here’s Rory Sutherland on the Spectator blog:

“….here lies the central challenge of the ‘Big Society’. In Britain our spectacular capacity for collective action in opposing things (Nazism, new housing, nightclubs) is matched only by our inability to harness any will or consensus when it comes to doing something new. Worse, our resistance to change is often self-defeating, since the only people not defeated by the bureaucratic hurdles are huge organisations like Tesco — while those traditional smaller cafés and shops that traditionalists claim to love cannot summon the energy to clear them.”

He continues by promoting a smart ‘planning permission in return for something’ proposal that I’m sure I’ve seen before somewhere (when you think about it, it’s a locally hypothecated variation on Land Value Tax, isn’t it?), but nevertheless, it’s a good one.

Related Posts:

September 1 2010, 05:44

From: In The Eye Of The Storm (Alan)

Boris Bike Robbery

201009012242.jpg

Or did someone not get the supply/demand forecast right for each location and now they have to swing more bikes than expected between racks across town?

Took my first Boris bike ride today - two rides in fact - and came away hugely impressed. Easy to dock and undock, good quality bikes, no mechanical issues. Brilliant job.

September 1 2010, 02:43

From: Emma Mulqueeny (Mulqueeny)

*sigh* private school/parenting/guilt/not being a millionaire yet

So, some of you more regulars here may note that I use this blog for a variety of things, but often for working out stuff in my head, whether that be work things, or sometimes more personal. So don’t read this if you hate the personal stuff.

I know for sure that I will get bashed a bit for sending my children to private school. They didn’t always, it was only when I moved to Guildford and could not get them both into the same State school that the local private village school seemed a nice and not too pricey alternative, I had made some savings on my move out of London and I was working all the hours God sends.

The problem with a lovely, not exclusively expensive junior school, is that then it gets you into the not so nice and cosy private senior school, that costs an eye-watering amount of money – but you feel compelled to make that happen, somehow, in order for your child to have the best education – because what could be any more important?

So I have spent the last year scrabbling and stumbling my way through paying fees that I simply couldn’t realistically carry on paying, unless I ditched all morality or suddenly became a millionaire – something that I had always hoped would wonderfully happen one day (the millionaire thing not the morality ditching).

Truth be told, I was never completely sure what exactly I was paying for anyway, as we never really did fit in a grand private senior school and our lifestyle and values were sometimes in direct contrast with those of the school. But yes, you could say this is all very well in hindsight.

Anyhow. The savings stashes and ebay-able items eventually ran out and I had to throw myself on the mercy of the school, to hold on to my eldest for the next term – or until I could find her a place at a local school that would also work for my youngest – who enjoys a multi-coloured variety of educational variant needs – for when she ascends into the dizzy heights of senior school.

Today I find out that said educational business – and I was reminded that it was a business (fair enough – although they give themselves a charitable status officially!) won’t actually fathom having her there without the fees for any period of time, and so it was goodbye and good luck. I left the bursar’s office with advice ringing in my ears such as: ‘Use this to your benefit, cry to the Council to get her into a school’.

And so I have a week to find a school that my daughter can go to – much to her utter delight, I have to say (with some relief).

I am writing this as I am experiencing a myriad of confusing emotions:

  • relief that I no longer have to fear the beginning of every term and the massive bill
  • relief that I no longer have to send my child to a school where she feels ill-at-ease socially
  • horror that my dastardly decisions have got us to this point
  • disappointment that I can’t make a choice about any education in the land for my lovely daughters
  • fear that I may have no option about what school she goes to now
  • fear for her future – she has had to go to a total of seven schools because I have moved so much – can she cope
  • social horror at my own attitude – wishing I could relax about this
  • disappointment that was not the perfect Mum – gifting my offspring with security and stability at school and home

And so, I suppose, whilst I work through these things (helped along by the skipping joy of my eldest) I would say one thing to any young parents out there thinking they would ever one day be in my position: choose the safe option with education, go for the security and stability. Be as playful as you like with your own lives and living, but make sure your children get the good stuff, regular friends and regular education.

Playing the rags and riches thing with education will really do your head in – even if it is not necessarily as big a deal as we think.

Right… go ahead with the mauling *hides*